Morris Routing Technologies, LLC v. Verizon Communications, Inc., et al.
| Morris Routing Technologies, LLC |
| Verizon Services Corporation, Cellco Partnership doing business as Verizon Wireless and Verizon Communications, Inc. |
| 4:2024cv00626 |
| July 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sean D Jordan |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrew James Sherman on behalf of Morris Routing Technologies, LLC (Sherman, Andrew) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Morris Routing Technologies, LLC. Amendment to #1 Complaint,,,,, - Amended Exhibit K, filed by Morris Routing Technologies, LLC. Related document(s): #1 Complaint,,,,, filed by Morris Routing Technologies, LLC.(Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Morris Routing Technologies, LLC. Verizon Communications, Inc. served on 7/18/2024; Verizon Services Corporation served on 7/18/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 11 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Cellco Partnership.(Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 10 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Verizon Communications, Inc.(Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 9 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Verizon Services Corporation.(Smith, Melissa) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Cellco Partnership to 9/14/2024. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension. (jmb) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Verizon Communications, Inc. to 9/14/2024. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension. (jmb) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Verizon Services Corporation to 9/14/2024. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension. (jmb) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Morris Routing Technologies, LLC. Cellco Partnership served on 7/10/2024. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Verizon Services Corporation. (baf) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Verizon Communications, Inc. (baf) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Cellco Partnership. (baf) |
| Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Morris Routing Technologies, LLC (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10226036.), filed by Morris Routing Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D,COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10226036.), filed by Morris Routing Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Civil Cover Sheet)(Devlin, Timo #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Civil Cover Sheet)(Devlin, Timothy) (Attachment 17 replaced on 7/22/2024) (jmb). thy) (Attachment 17 replaced on 7/22/2024) (jmb). |
| Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (baf) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
