Kelley v. Kroger Texas, L.P.
| Margaret Kelley |
| Kroger Texas, L.P. |
| 4:2024cv00746 |
| August 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) AND (2) Disclosure Statement filed by Margaret Kelley (Kennedy, William) |
Filing 6
ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/25/2024. Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 11/8/2024 at 02:00 PM to be held via Zoom or telephone; instructions will follow, before District Judge Amos L. Mazzant III. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/20/2024. (dlw)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER AND ADVISORY. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 8/23/2024. (jmb)
|
| Filing 4 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT*** ORIGINAL ANSWER to #1 ORIGINAL PETITION by Kroger Texas, L.P. (jmb) |
| Filing 3 ***ORIGINALLY FILED IN STATE COURT*** ORIGINAL PETITION against Kroger Texas L.P., filed by Margaret Kelley. (jmb) |
| Note: Pursuant to Local Rule CV 7(j), any motions pending in another federal or state court made by any party will be considered moot at the time of transfer or removal unless they are re-urged in this court. (jmb) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (jmb) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (jmb) |
| Filing 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) AND (2) Disclosure Statement filed by Kroger Texas L.P. (Briscoe, Bryan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Kroger Texas L.P. from 397th Judicial District, case number CV-24-1317. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10303817), filed by Kroger Texas L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s), #2 Exhibit)(Briscoe, Bryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kelley v. Kroger Texas, L.P. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Margaret Kelley | |
| Represented By: | William Paul Kennedy |
| Represented By: | Rhonda Diane Holcomb |
| Represented By: | Joan Elizabeth Ballard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kroger Texas, L.P. | |
| Represented By: | Bryan Kyle Briscoe |
| Represented By: | Alan Jay Rosenberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
