Ramakrishnan v. United States Department of State, et al.
| Praveen Kumar Ramakrishnan |
| U.S. Consulate in Chennai, India, United States Department of State, Chris Hodges, Antony Blinken, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
| 4:2024cv00928 |
| October 17, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou. (baf) |
| Filing 16 Summons Issued as to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (baf) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS REISSUED as to Chris Hodges. (baf) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS REISSUED as to Antony Blinken. (baf) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS REISSUED as to U.S. Consulate in Chennai, India. (baf) |
| Filing 12 Summons Reissued as to United States Department of State, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons Reissued - Merrick Garland, Attorney General, #2 Summons Reissued - Damien Diggs, US Attorney)(baf) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by J Kevin McClendon on behalf of United States Department of State, Antony Blinken (McClendon, J) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Antony Blinken, Chris Hodges, U.S. Consulate in Chennai, India, United States Department of State, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, filed by Praveen Kumar Ramakrishnan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hacking, James) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion to Amend Complaint. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 12/2/2024. (baf)
|
| Filing 8 FIRST MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint, by Praveen Kumar Ramakrishnan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Hacking, James) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/27/2024: #3 Supplement) (baf). |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Praveen Kumar Ramakrishnan. Antony Blinken served on 10/24/2024; Chris Hodges served on 10/24/2024; U.S. Consulate in Chennai, India served on 10/24/2024; United States Department of State served on 10/24/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit mail receipt)(Hacking, James) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Chris Hodges. (xl) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Antony Blinken. (xl) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to U.S. Consulate in Chennai, India. (xl) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to United States Department of State, Damien Diggs, (U.S. Attorney), Merrick Garland, (Attorney General). (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(xl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Antony Blinken, Chris Hodges, U.S. Consulate in Chennai, India, United States Department of State ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10423538.), filed by Praveen Kumar Ramakrishnan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hacking, James) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (xl) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III. (xl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
