Karre v. Secretary, U.S. Department of State, et al
| Akhil Karre |
| Secretary, U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of State Bureau of Consular Affairs, Charge d' Affaires, U.S. Embassy to India, DOS, Consul General, U.S. Consulate General, Chennai (Chennai Consulate), DOS, Officer, Nonimmigrant Visa Unit, Consular Section, Chennai Consulate, DOS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Department of Justice and Attorney General of the United States |
| 4:2025cv00308 |
| March 24, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer All Defendants. It is therefore ORDERED Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint is GRANTED. Defendants shall file their response to Plaintiffs' Complaint on or before November 7, 2025. Signed by Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant on 9/9/2025. (baf)
|
| Filing 10 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McClendon, J) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer for All Defendants. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants shall file their response to Plaintiffs' Complaint on or before September 8, 2025. Signed by Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant on 8/8/2025. (baf)
|
| Filing 8 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McClendon, J) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants shall file their response to Plaintiffs' Complaint on or before August 9, 2025. Signed by Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant on 5/28/2025. (baf)
|
| Filing 6 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McClendon, J) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Akhil Karre. Attorney General of the United States served on 4/7/2025; Charge d' Affaires, U.S. Embassy to India, DOS served on 4/7/2025; Consul General, U.S. Consulate General, Chennai (Chennai Consulate), DOS served on 4/7/2025; Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Department of Justice served on 4/7/2025; Officer, Nonimmigrant Visa Unit, Consular Section, Chennai Consulate, DOS served on 4/7/2025; Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security served on 4/7/2025; Secretary, U.S. Department of State served on 4/7/2025; U.S. Department of State Bureau of Consular Affairs served on 4/7/2025. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service on US Attorney General, #2 Proof of Service on Secretary of State Rubio, #3 SBO DOS Bureau of Consular Affairs Armstrong, #4 Proof of Service on Charge d'Affaires Andrews, #5 Proof of Service on Consul General Hodges, #6 Proof of Service on NIV Officer Doe, #7 Proof of Service on DHS Secretary Noem, #8 Proof of Service on FBI Director Patel)(Rosen, Adam) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Charge d' Affaires, U.S. Embassy to India, DOS, Consul General, U.S. Consulate General, Chennai (Chennai Consulate), DOS, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Officer, Nonimmigrant Visa Unit, Consular Section, Chennai Consulate, DOS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Secretary, U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of State Bureau of Consular Affairs and sent via email to Plaintiff's counsel for service. (kcv) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Attorney General of the United States, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General and sent via email to Plaintiff's counsel for service. (kcv) |
| Case ASSIGNED to Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant. (baf) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (baf) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER transferring this case to the Sherman Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 3/26/25. (kcv)
|
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (kcv) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Marcia A. Crone. (kcv) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jorgan K. Andrews, John Armstrong, Pam Bondi, John Doe, Chris Hodges, Kristi Noem, Kash Patel, Marco Rubio ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10743531.), filed by Akhil Karre. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Table and Exhibits A to G, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rosen, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
