Encryptawave Technologies LLC v. Nintendo Co., Ltd.
| Encryptawave Technologies LLC |
| Nintendo Co., Ltd. |
| 4:2025cv00330 |
| March 31, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sean D Jordan |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120) at termination of case. AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (mmc) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE: Notice of Dismissal: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), and following the submission of (Dkt. #7), this civil case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk will close and terminate this matter. (ldm) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Encryptawave Technologies LLC (Bennett, David) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Encryptawave Technologies LLC. Nintendo Co., Ltd. waiver sent on 7/3/2025, answer due 10/1/2025. (Kalberg, Steven) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by David R Bennett on behalf of Encryptawave Technologies LLC (Bennett, David) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Nintendo Co., Ltd. (mmc) |
| Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Encryptawave Technologies LLC identifying Other Affiliate Inferential Capital LLC for Encryptawave Technologies LLC. (Kalberg, Steven) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Kalberg, Steven) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Nintendo Co., Ltd. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10756675.), filed by Encryptawave Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A United States Patent No. 7,233,664, #2 Exhibit B Office Action re Pros. History U.S. Patent No. 7,233,664, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kalberg, Steven) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (mmc) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Encryptawave Technologies LLC v. Nintendo Co., Ltd. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Encryptawave Technologies LLC | |
| Represented By: | Steven Kalberg |
| Represented By: | David R Bennett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nintendo Co., Ltd. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
