Graham v. GMET Communications, LLC
| Heather Graham |
| GMET Communications, LLC and One Outsourcing LLC |
| 4:2025cv00591 |
| June 3, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 12/15/2025. Signed by Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant on 9/24/2025. (rpc)
|
| Filing 16 Answer and Affirmative Defenses ANSWER to #9 Amended Complaint by One Outsourcing LLC.(Tobolowsky, Michael) |
| Filing 15 Answer and Affirmative Defenses ANSWER to #9 Amended Complaint by GMET Communications, LLC.(Tobolowsky, Michael) |
| Due to the Court's civil trial docket, the Court hereby CANCELS the September 11, 2025 Scheduling Conference; the Court will enter a Scheduling Order. (No attachment) (tls) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Heather Graham. One Outsourcing LLC served on 8/28/2025. (Meeks, Rowdy) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Issued as to One Outsourcing LLC. (rpc) |
| Filing 12 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Meeks, Rowdy) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/28/2025: #1 Proposed Order) (rpc). |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Service of Plaintiff's Rule 26 Initial Disclosure Statement by Heather Graham (Meeks, Rowdy) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to File. Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Dkt. #9 ) is deemed filed. Signed by Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant on 8/25/2025. (rpc)
|
| Filing 9 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Heather Graham.(Meeks, Rowdy) |
| Filing 8 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint by Heather Graham. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Meeks, Rowdy) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/28/2025. Rule 16 Management Conference set for 9/11/2025 at 10:30 AM via Zoom or telephone before Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant. Signed by Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant on 7/25/2025. (rpc)
|
| Filing 6 Original Answer and Affirmative Defenses ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by GMET Communications, LLC.(Tobolowsky, Michael) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing of FLSA Consent to Join by Heather Graham (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s) FLSA Consent to Join)(Meeks, Rowdy) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Heather Graham. GMET Communications, LLC served on 6/12/2025. (Meeks, Rowdy) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Rowdy Byron Meeks on behalf of Heather Graham (Meeks, Rowdy) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to GMET Communications, LLC. (rpc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FLSA Collective and Class Action against GMET Communications, LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10880080.), filed by Heather Graham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit FLSA Consent to Join)(Meeks, Rowdy) |
| Case assigned to Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant. (rpc) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (rpc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
