Ruiz v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner: Marcelo Martin Ruiz
Respondent: Director Bryan Collier
Case Number: 4:2025cv00741
Filed: July 9, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2025 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus 28 USC 2254 ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number ATXEDC-10950650.), filed by Marcelo Martin Ruiz. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s) Court of Appeals Opinion, #2 Additional Attachment(s) Trial Court Order on 11.07 Writ)(Therrian, Kyle)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ruiz v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Marcelo Martin Ruiz
Represented By: Kyle Timothy Therrian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director Bryan Collier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?