Wolfe v. AmDocs Inc et al
| Veronica Wolfe |
| AmDocs Inc, The Investment Committee of AmDocs Inc and John Does 1-10 |
| 4:2025cv00880 |
| August 14, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| J Campbell Barker |
| K Nicole Mitchell |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1145 E.R.I.S.A. |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Civil action dismissed without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a) and #11 notice of dismissal. (ndc) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Veronica Wolfe (Gyandoh, Mark) |
Filing 10
ORDER referring case to Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell. The court designates a magistrate judge to the full extent authorized by 28 U.S.C. 636(b) to handle this matter. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 8/22/2025. (mmc)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by James Maro on behalf of Veronica Wolfe. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-11035340. (Maro, James) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Mark Gyandoh on behalf of Veronica Wolfe. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-11035295. (Gyandoh, Mark) |
| Filing 7 CORRECTED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT by Veronica Wolfe. (White, Daniel) Modified on 8/18/2025 to show corrected, not amended(jbe). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER Regulating Practice. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 8/14/2025. (mmc)
|
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mmc) |
| Case assigned to District Judge J. Campbell Barker. (mmc) |
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Texas Northern; Case Number 3:25-cv-02186. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. Pursuant to LR CV-7(j), other than in a prisoner case, any motion pending in the transferor district is considered moot, has been terminated, and must be re-urged to be considered in this district. |
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC Order Transferring to Eastern District. Plaintiff Veronica Wolfe filed this class action case in federal court against Defendants Amdocs, Inc., The Investment Committee of Amdocs, Inc., and John Does 1-10. Doc. No. 1 at 1. Plaintiff alleges, generally, that Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to Plaintiff and other employees by failing to satisfy their duties in managing a defined contribution plan subject to ERISA regulation. See id. at 2-5. Plaintiff further alleges that venue is proper in the Northern District of Texas because a substantial part of the events giving rise to her claims occurred in this District, Plaintiff resides in this District, and Defendants reside and may be found in this District. Id. at 6. However, Plaintiff states that she resides in Allen, Texas, and alleges that Amdocs, Inc. only Texas-based office is located in Plano, Texas. Id. Both Allen and Plano are in Collin County, which is located in the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division. 28 U.S.C. § 124(c)(3). In a phone call with the Court, Plaintiff's local counsel agreed that the parties are located in Collin County and transferring this case to the Eastern District of Texas is appropriate.For these reasons, the Court finds that the case has a more substantial connection to the Eastern District of Texas. Accordingly, on the Court's own motion, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division. 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a); see also § 124(c)(3). (Ordered by Judge Ed Kinkeade on 8/14/2025) (chmb) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 8/14/2025.]
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to AmDocs Inc, John Does 1-10, The Investment Committee of AmDocs Inc. (cfk) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 8/14/2025.] |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Rutherford). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (cfk) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 8/14/2025.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Veronica Wolfe. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number ATXNDC-15734727) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (White, Daniel) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 8/14/2025.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
