Lewis v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., et al.
Plaintiff: Scott Phillip Lewis
Defendant: Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. and Betsy Barber
Case Number: 4:2025cv01086
Filed: October 6, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Aileen Goldman Durrett
Referring Judge: Sean D Jordan
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2025 Filing 8 Mail sent to Scott Lewis returned as undeliverable re #7 Case Assigned/Reassigned. (mmc)
October 6, 2025 Filing 7 Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Sean D. Jordan and REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Aileen Goldman Durrett. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Referral) (jmb)
October 6, 2025 Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Texas Northern; Case Number 3:25-cv-02436. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. Pursuant to LR CV-7(j), other than in a prisoner case, any motion pending in the transferor district is considered moot, has been terminated, and must be re-urged to be considered in this district.
October 6, 2025 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (Copy of the notice to be sent by US Mail to parties not electronically noticed.) **Form sent to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. (jmb)
October 6, 2025 Note: Pursuant to Local Rule CV 7(j), any motions pending in another federal or state court made by any party will be considered moot at the time of transfer or removal unless they are re-urged in this court. (jmb)
October 6, 2025 Clerk's Notice of Mailing - Doc(s) #7 , Consent to Proceed Before US Magistrate Form, Consent Form to Receive Electronic Notice; Pro Se Filing Instructions mailed to Scott Phillip Lewis at the address indicated on the NEF unless otherwise indicated. Mail type: Regular. (jmb)
September 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order Transferring to Another District: Case transferred to Sherman Division of Eastern District of Texas. So this action will be transferred on 10/3/2025, to allow any party to file an objection to Judge Boyle within 14 days after being served with a copy of this order, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(a). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 9/12/2025) (axm) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 10/6/2025.]
September 12, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Fri Sep 12 12:09:19 CDT 2025 (crt) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 10/6/2025.]
September 9, 2025 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Scott Phillip Lewis. (kcr) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 10/6/2025.]
September 9, 2025 Filing 3 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Betsy Barber, Charles Schwab & Co Inc filed by Scott Phillip Lewis. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (kcr) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 10/6/2025.]
September 9, 2025 Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (kcr) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 10/6/2025.]
September 9, 2025 Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. SCREEN case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Horan (see Special Order 3). Initiating documents received by mail. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Horan). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (kcr) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 10/6/2025.]
September 9, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1, 2. Tue Sep 9 15:25:49 CDT 2025 (crt) [Transferred from Texas Northern on 10/6/2025.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lewis v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Phillip Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Betsy Barber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?