Mobility Workx, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
| Mobility Workx, LLC |
| Microsoft Corporation |
| 4:2025cv01367 |
| December 9, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (baf) |
| Filing 19 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Mobility Workx, LLC. (Ravicher, Daniel) |
| Filing 18 JOINT MOTION to Stay by Mobility Workx, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ravicher, Daniel) |
Filing 17
ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS. This case is set for the Initial Rule 16 Management Conference on 5/18/2026 at 9:00 AM. to be held via Zoom or telephone, before Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant. Signed by Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant on 3/19/2026. (baf)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kirstin L Stoll-DeBell on behalf of Microsoft Corporation (Stoll-DeBell, Kirstin) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response re #12 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Mobility Workx's Complaint Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Responses due by 3/27/2026. Signed by Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant on 3/16/2026. (baf)
|
| Filing 14 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #12 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Mobility Workx's Complaint Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) by Mobility Workx, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ravicher, Daniel) |
| Filing 13 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Microsoft Corporation (McCoy, Andrew) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Mobility Workx's Complaint Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) by Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McCoy, Andrew) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrew M McCoy on behalf of Microsoft Corporation (McCoy, Andrew) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Complaint. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Microsoft Corporation's deadline to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff Mobility Workx, LLC's Complaint for Patent Infringement is EXTENDED up to and including March 1, 2026. Signed by Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant on 1/20/2026. (jmb)
|
| Filing 9 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND O PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT by Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. Microsoft Corporation answer is now due 2/15/2025. (Text entry only, no document attached.)(baf) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by Microsoft Corporation. Summons originally served on 12/11/2025. Agreed new answer date is 2/15/2026.(Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 6 Summons returned executed by Mobility Workx, LLC. Microsoft Corporation served on 12/10/2025. (Ravicher, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 Summons issued as to Microsoft Corporation. (baf) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ravicher, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Daniel B Ravicher on behalf of Mobility Workx, LLC (Ravicher, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Mobility Workx, LLC (Ravicher, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Microsoft Corporation ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11250648.), filed by Mobility Workx, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ravicher, Daniel) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (Copy of the notice to be sent by US Mail to parties not electronically noticed.) (baf) |
| Case assigned to Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant. (baf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mobility Workx, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mobility Workx, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Daniel B Ravicher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Microsoft Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Melissa Richards Smith |
| Represented By: | Kirstin L Stoll-DeBell |
| Represented By: | Andrew M McCoy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
