Daniels v. Denton County, et al.
| Adrienne Nicole Daniels |
| Denton County, Denton County Precinct 1 and Denton County Clerk |
| 4:2025cv01379 |
| December 11, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Bill Davis |
| Sean D Jordan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. It is ORDERED that the application, Dkt. #2 , is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that service of process be withheld pending judicial screening of the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) and 28 U.S.C. 1915A. See Newsome, 301 F.3d at 231 (applying 1915(e)(2)(B) screening to nonprisoners). The plaintiff may not file any amendments or supplements to the complaint without court approval. A complete amended complaint must be attached to any motion for leave to amend. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bill Davis on 12/15/2025. (jmb)
|
| Filing 3 Non-prisoner pro se consent to receive electronic notice filed by Adrienne Nicole Daniels. (jmb) |
| Filing 2 Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Adrienne Nicole Daniels. (jmb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Denton County, Denton County Clerk, Denton County Precinct 1 (fee not paid), filed by Adrienne Nicole Daniels. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jmb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
