Cook v. Todd, Bremer & Lawson, Inc.
| Christopher Cook |
| Todd, Bremer & Lawson, Inc. |
| 4:2025cv01384 |
| December 11, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sean D Jordan |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE: Stipulation of Dismissal: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and following the parties submission of (Dkt. #9), this civil case is dismissed with prejudice. The clerk will close and terminate this matter. (ldm) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Christopher Cook. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Dismissing Case with Prejudice)(Smith, Claude) |
Filing 8
ORDER. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff Christopher Cook's Notice of Nonsuit With Prejudice, (Dkt. #7 ), is STRICKEN. Plaintiff Christopher Cook is further ORDERED to submit an amended notice or motion by May 4, 2026, articulating a basis under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for closing this action. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 4/21/2026. (CLC)
|
| Filing 7 ***STRICKEN PER DKT 8 *** NOTICE of nonsuit with prejudice by Christopher Cook (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order PO)(Smith, Claude) Modified on 4/21/2026 (CLC). |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Extend the Responsive Pleading Deadline. Todd, Bremer & Lawson, Inc. answer due 2/27/2026. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 2/9/2026. (CLC)
|
| Filing 5 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Todd, Bremer & Lawson, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Walker, Cooper) |
| Filing 4 Summons returned executed by Christopher Cook. Todd, Bremer & Lawson, Inc. served on 1/16/2026. (Smith, Claude) |
| Filing 3 Summons issued as to Todd, Bremer & Lawson, Inc. (CLC) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue summons filed by Christopher Cook. (Smith, Claude) |
| Case: Cook v. Todd, Bremer & Lawson, Inc. was filed on 12/11/2025 and assigned to Judge Jordan. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is attached. (CLC) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (CLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Todd, Bremer & Lawson, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11256550.), filed by Christopher Cook. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Bartholow, Theodore) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cook v. Todd, Bremer & Lawson, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christopher Cook | |
| Represented By: | Claude Dabney Smith |
| Represented By: | Theodore O Bartholow, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Todd, Bremer & Lawson, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Cooper Morgan Walker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.