Mobility Workx, LLC v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company et al
| Mobility Workx, LLC |
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and Aruba Networks LLC |
| 4:2026cv00053 |
| January 15, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 JOINT MOTION to Dismiss by Mobility Workx, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ravicher, Daniel) |
Filing 22
ORDER granting #21 JOINT MOTION to Stay filed by Mobility Workx, LLC. It is therefore ORDERED that all deadlines between Plaintiff Mobility Workx, LLC and Defendants Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and Aruba Networks, LLC, including those with the Court, are STAYED for thirty (30) days. Signed by Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant on 6/15/2026. (CLC)
|
| Filing 21 JOINT MOTION to Stay by Mobility Workx, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ravicher, Daniel) |
| Filing 20 REPLY to Response re #13 CORRECTED MOTION to Dismiss - Defendants' Corrected Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) filed by Aruba Networks LLC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Yungwirth, Matthew) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS: Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 7/6/2026 at 09:00 AM, to be held via Zoom or telephone, before Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant. Signed by Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant on 5/6/2026. (CLC)
|
| Filing 18 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 CORRECTED MOTION to Dismiss - Defendants' Corrected Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), #12 MOTION to Dismiss - Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) filed by Mobility Workx, LLC. (Ravicher, Daniel) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #13 CORRECTED MOTION to Dismiss - Defendants' Corrected Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Responses due by 5/5/2026. Signed by Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant on 4/23/2026. (CLC)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION Regarding Pre-Suit Indirect and Willful Infringement by Mobility Workx, LLC. (Ravicher, Daniel) |
| Filing 15 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply To Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by Mobility Workx, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ravicher, Daniel) |
| Filing 14 CORRECTED Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Aruba Networks LLC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (Yungwirth, Matthew) |
| Filing 13 CORRECTED MOTION to Dismiss - Defendants' Corrected Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) by Aruba Networks LLC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Yungwirth, Matthew) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss - Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) by Aruba Networks LLC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Yungwirth, Matthew) Terminated by Corrected Motion (Dkt. #13 ) on 4/8/2026 (CLC). |
| Filing 11 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Aruba Networks LLC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (Yungwirth, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew Sean Yungwirth on behalf of Aruba Networks LLC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (Yungwirth, Matthew) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Motionfor Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Aruba Networks LLC answer due 4/7/2026; Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company answer due 4/7/2026. Signed by Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant on 1/29/2026. (CLC)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joseph Edward Hillman on behalf of Aruba Networks LLC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (Hillman, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 AGREED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT by Aruba Networks LLC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Doan, Jennifer) |
| Filing 6 Summons returned executed by Mobility Workx, LLC. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company served on 1/16/2026. (Ravicher, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 Summons issued as to Aruba Networks LLC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons - HP)(CLC) |
| Case: Mobility Workx, LLC v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company et al was filed on 1/15/2026 and assigned to Judge Mazzant. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is provided via hyperlink. (CLC) |
| Case assigned to Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant. (CLC) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ravicher, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Daniel B Ravicher on behalf of Mobility Workx, LLC (Ravicher, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Mobility Workx, LLC (Ravicher, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Aruba Networks LLC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11313241.), filed by Mobility Workx, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Counsel is reminded to file form required by LR CV-4(a).)(Ravicher, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
