Neathery v. Martin, et al.
| Keva Dee Neathery |
| Phillip Martin, Jason White, Phillip Staton, Joe Ward, Kevin Hoeffer and Cody Gamon |
| 4:2026cv00175 |
| February 18, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| K Nicole Mitchell |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
FINAL JUDGMENT. The Court, having considered Plaintiff's case and rendered its decision by opinion issued this same date, hereby enters FINAL JUDGMENT. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Title VII claims are DISMISSED with prejudice, and Plaintiff's state-law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Any motions pending in this case are DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is instructed to close this case. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 7/19/2026. (rpc)
|
Filing 15
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE #8 . Plaintiff's Title VII claims are therefore DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state-law claims. Therefore, Plaintiff's state-law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 7/19/2026. (rpc)
|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to #13 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Keva Dee Neathery. (RECEIVED AT 200 North Travis Street, Sherman, Texas on 7/6/2026 and RECEIVED in the Clerk's office on 7/9/2026) (baf) |
Filing 13
ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's motions for appointment of counsel (Docs. #11 and #12 ) are DENIED without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have through July 6, 2026 to file an objection to the Court's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #8 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 6/24/2026. (jmb)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION Requesting Assistance in Obtaining Legal Representation by Keva Dee Neathery. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmb) |
| Filing 11 REQUEST for Assistance in Obtaining Counsel and SUPPLEMENT to Motion for Extenion of Time by Keva Dee Neathery. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmb) |
Filing 10
ORDER. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. #9 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's deadline to file written objections is extended to June 22, 2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 5/29/2026. (jmb)
|
| Filing 9 Pro Se MOTION for Extension of Time by Keva Dee Neathery. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (jmb) |
| Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. It is recommended that Plaintiff's Title VII claims be DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). It is further recommended that the Court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state-law assault claim and that it be DISMISSED without prejudice. Objections due within 14 days of receipt. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 5/8/2026. (rpc) |
| Filing 7 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Keva Dee Neathery. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s))(jmb) |
Filing 6
ORDER. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have 30 days from receipt of this Order to file an Amended Complaint addressing each deficiency noted above. In accordance with Local Rule CV-3(d), Plaintiff's Amended Complaint should not exceed 30 pages in length, excluding attachments. Plaintiff is further ORDERED to state in her Amended Complaint the addresses where each defendant may be served. The Amended Complaint will replace the Original Complaint. The Amended Complaint shall include the case numbe-Civil Action No. 4:26-cv-175-at the top of the first page. Failure to replead in conformity with this Order may result in dismissal of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). Additionally, failure to timely replead may result in dismissal of the lawsuit for failure to prosecute. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b). Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 3/18/2026. (jmb)
|
Filing 5
ORDER. Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #3 ). Having reviewed the application, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #3 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 3/18/2026. (jmb)
|
| Filing 4 Case: 4:26-cv-00175-JDK-KNM Neathery v. Martin, et al. was filed on 2/18/2026 and assigned to Judge Kernodle and referred to Judge Mitchell. (Clerk Reminder - Ensure this entry and the attached Non-prisoner Pro Se Instructions, Invitation to a Non-Prisoner Pro Se to E-Filing/Consent to Electronic Notice, and Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge are sent to Pro Se.) (jmb) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Keva Dee Neathery. (jmb) |
| Filing 2 Non-prisoner pro se consent to receive electronic notice filed by Keva Dee Neathery. (jmb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (fee not paid), filed by Keva Dee Neathery. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Additional Attachment(s), #3 Exhibit A)(jmb) |
| SanDisk USB for #1 housed in Plano vault. (xl) |
| Clerk's Notice of Mailing - Doc(s) #4 mailed to Keva Dee Neathery at the address indicated on the NEF unless otherwise indicated. Mail type: Email. (jmb) Modified on 2/18/2026 (jmb). |
| Case ASSIGNED to District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle and REFERRED to Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell. (jmb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.