Poulin Holdings, LLC v. Databricks, Inc.
| Poulin Holdings, LLC |
| Databricks, Inc. |
| 4:2026cv00245 |
| March 10, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
SCHEDULING ORDER. The telephonic Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 9/4/2026 is CANCELLED. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 8/25/2026. (esw)
|
| Filing 18 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Plan and Schedule for Discovery)(Hecht, David) |
Filing 17
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Leave to File Under Seal. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 8/14/2026. (esw)
|
| Filing 16 SEALED MOTION Defendant Databricks, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California Pursuant to U.S.C. 1404(a) by Databricks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit/Declaration of Abhinav Taneja in Support of Defendant Databricks, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California Pursuant to U.S.C. 1404(a), #2 Affidavit/Declaration Declaration of Jessica M. Kaempf iin Support of Defendant Databricks, Inc.'s Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California Pursuant to U.S.C. 1404(a), #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C [Filed Under Seal], #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit I, #12 Exhibit J, #13 Exhibit K, #14 Exhibit L, #15 Exhibit M, #16 Exhibit N, #17 Exhibit O, #18 Exhibit P, #19 Exhibit Q, #20 Proposed Order)(Kaempf, Jessica) |
| Filing 15 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Seal Defendant Databricks, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Under Seal by Databricks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kaempf, Jessica) |
Filing 14
ORDER GOVERNING PROCEEDINGS: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/24/2026. Telephonic Rule 16 Management Conference SET for 9/4/2026 at 10:00 AM before District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle. Conference Dial-In: (571) 353-2301; Teleconference call-in information is provided as follows: Meeting ID: 925279946. Signed by District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle on 8/3/2026. (jmb) Modified on 8/3/2026 (jmb).
|
| Filing 13 AMENDED Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Poulin Holdings, LLC identifying Interested Party Aequitas Technologies LLC, Interested Party Chris Poulin for Poulin Holdings, LLC. (Hecht, David) |
| Filing 12 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Databricks, Inc. (Sacksteder, Michael) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Databricks, Inc..(Sacksteder, Michael) |
| Filing 10 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by Databricks, Inc.. Summons originally served on April 28, 2026. Agreed new answer date is June 18, 2026.(Kaempf, Jessica) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Geoffrey Robert Miller on behalf of Databricks, Inc. (Miller, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jessica Andrea Martinez Kaempf on behalf of Databricks, Inc. (Kaempf, Jessica) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Vigen Salmastlian on behalf of Databricks, Inc. (Salmastlian, Vigen) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael J Sacksteder on behalf of Databricks, Inc. (Sacksteder, Michael) |
| Filing 5 Summons issued as to Databricks, Inc. (jmb) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Poulin Holdings, LLC. (Hecht, David) |
| Case: 4:26-cv-00245-JDK Poulin Holdings, LLC v. Databricks, Inc. was filed on 3/10/2026 and assigned to Judge Kernodle. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is provided via hyperlink. (jmb) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle. (jmb) |
| Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Poulin Holdings, LLC (Hecht, David) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Hecht, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Databricks, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11416684.), filed by Poulin Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - 977 Patent, #2 Exhibit B - 090 Patent, #3 Exhibit C - 977 Claim Chart, #4 Exhibit D - 090 Claim Chart, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Counsel is reminded to file form required by LR CV-4(a).)(Hecht, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Poulin Holdings, LLC v. Databricks, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Poulin Holdings, LLC | |
| Represented By: | David L Hecht |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Databricks, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Vigen Salmastlian |
| Represented By: | Jessica Andrea Martinez Kaempf |
| Represented By: | Geoffrey Robert Miller |
| Represented By: | Michael J Sacksteder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.