Orobitg v. Ericsson Inc.
Plaintiff: Sisy Orobitg
Defendant: Ericsson Inc.
Case Number: 4:2026cv00340
Filed: April 6, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Sean D Jordan
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part #4 Motion to Consolidate Cases and Appoint Interim Class Counsel. The Related Actions shall be consolidated for all purposes, including pretrial proceedings and trial, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a), before this Court (the Consolidated Action). Gray v. Ericsson Inc., No. 4:26-CV-266-SDJ, is designated the Lead Case. All parties are instructed to file any future filings in the Lead Case. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 4/28/2026. (mmc)
April 28, 2026 Opinion or Order This civil action is CONSOLIDATED with cause 4:26-cv-266 designated as the Lead Case. All future pleadings are to be filed in the Lead Case. (mmc)
April 28, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RESPONSE re #4 JOINT MOTION to Consolidate Cases Appoint Interim Class Counsel, and Set Deadlines for Filing of Consolidated Complaint filed by Ericsson Inc.. (Lantry, Ryan)
April 27, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 TRANSFER ORDER. Case reassigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan for all further proceedings. Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant on 4/27/2026. (CLC)
April 23, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 JOINT MOTION to Consolidate Cases Appoint Interim Class Counsel, and Set Deadlines for Filing of Consolidated Complaint by Sisy Orobitg. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Federman & Sherwood Firm Resume, #2 Exhibit B - Strauss Borrelli Firm Resume, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Federman, William)
April 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons issued as to Ericsson Inc. (CLC)
April 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Sisy Orobitg. (Federman, William)
April 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ericsson Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11465179.), filed by Sisy Orobitg. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Data Breach Notice Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet CCS)(Federman, William)
April 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Case assigned to Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant and Magistrate Judge Bill Davis. (CLC)
April 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Case: Orobitg v. Ericsson Inc. was filed on 4/6/2026 and assigned to Judge Mazzant and referred to Judge Davis. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is provided via hyperlink. (CLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Orobitg v. Ericsson Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sisy Orobitg
Represented By: Jessica Andrea Wilkes
Represented By: William B Federman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ericsson Inc.
Represented By: Ryan Lantry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?