Mims v. City of Lewisville, TX et al
| Kristen Mims |
| City of Lewisville, TX and Filemon Perez |
| 4:2026cv00383 |
| April 14, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Sean D Jordan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER. It is ORDERED that Defendant the City of Lewisville's Second Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. #15 ), is STRICKEN. Per the Court's Order staying this case, should the City wish to file a motion to dismiss that is exempt from the stay, it must move for leave to do so. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 6/12/2026. (CLC)
|
| Filing 15 ***STRICKEN PER DKT #16 *** SECOND MOTION to Dismiss by City of Lewisville, TX. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting City of Lewisville's Second Motion to Dismiss)(Curley, Kevin) Modified on 6/12/2026 (CLC). |
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Stay or Abate Case. It is ORDERED that this case is STAYED, as to both defendants, pending final resolution of the criminal proceedings against Defendant Filemon Perez. It is further ORDERED that Perez file a status report on the criminal proceedings every sixty (60) days, with the first report due July 28, 2026. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 5/29/2026. (CLC)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Stay Case due to parallel criminal case filed by Kristen Mims. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hutchison, Susan) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER denying as moot #5 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 5/27/2026. (CLC)
|
| Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Kristen Mims.(Hutchison, Susan) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Stay Case due to parallel criminal case by Filemon Perez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Indictment, #2 Exhibit Trial setting, #3 Proposed Order Proposed order)(East, Kenneth) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted. Filemon Perez answer is now due 6/29/2026. (Text entry only, no document attached.)(CLC) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint filed by Filemon Perez. Summons originally served on 05/11/2026. Agreed new answer date is 06/29/2026.(East, Kenneth) |
| Filing 7 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by City of Lewisville, TX. (Curley, Kevin) |
| Filing 6 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by City of Lewisville, TX (Curley, Kevin) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by City of Lewisville, TX. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Curley, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 Summons issued as to City of Lewisville, TX, Filemon Perez. (CLC) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Kristen Mims. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Hutchison, Susan) |
| Case: Mims v. City of Lewisville, TX et al was filed on 4/14/2026 and assigned to Judge Jordan. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is provided via hyperlink. (CLC) |
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER on Motions to Seal in Civil Cases. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 4/14/2026. (CLC)
|
| Case assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (CLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Lewisville, TX, Perez Filemon ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11482730.), filed by Kristen Mims. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hutchison, Susan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
