James v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Amy James
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 4:2026cv00520
Filed: May 18, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Aileen Goldman Durrett
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 17, 2026 Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s) 001 Certification Page.pdf, #2 Additional Attachment(s) 002 Court Transcript Index.pdf, #3 Additional Attachment(s) 003 Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable.pdf, #4 Additional Attachment(s) 004 Payment Documents and Decisions.pdf, #5 Additional Attachment(s) 005 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices.pdf, #6 Additional Attachment(s) 006 Non Disability Related Development.pdf, #7 Additional Attachment(s) 007 Disability Related Development Part 1.pdf, #8 Additional Attachment(s) 008 Disability Related Development Part 2.pdf, #9 Additional Attachment(s) 009 Medical Records Part 1.pdf, #10 Additional Attachment(s) 010 Medical Records Part 2.pdf, #11 Additional Attachment(s) 011 Medical Records Part 3.pdf, #12 Additional Attachment(s) 012 Medical Records Part 4.pdf, #13 Additional Attachment(s) 013 Medical Records Part 5.pdf, #14 Additional Attachment(s) 014 Medical Records Part 6.pdf, #15 Additional Attachment(s) 015 Medical Records Part 7.pdf, #16 Additional Attachment(s) 016 Medical Records Part 8.pdf, #17 Additional Attachment(s) 017 Medical Records Part 9.pdf, #18 Additional Attachment(s) 018 Medical Records Part 10.pdf, #19 Additional Attachment(s) 019 Medical Records Part 11.pdf, #20 Additional Attachment(s) 020 Medical Records Part 12.pdf, #21 Additional Attachment(s) 021 Medical Records Part 13.pdf, #22 Additional Attachment(s) 022 Medical Records Part 14.pdf)(Gaffney, Daniel)
June 29, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kendall Morrison Rees on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Rees, Kendall)
May 18, 2026 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Aileen Goldman Durrett. (CLC)
May 18, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of SSA ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11546383.) (Complaint NEF sent to SSA OGC and to EDTX USAO.), filed by Amy James o/b/o John Wesley James. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeal Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Olinsky, Howard)
May 18, 2026 Case: James v. Commissioner of Social Security was filed on 5/18/2026 and assigned to Judge Durrett. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is provided via hyperlink. (CLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy James
Represented By: Howard D. Olinsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Kendall Morrison Rees
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?