MCM Solutions LLC v. Rodriguez et al
| MCM Solutions LLC |
| Ruben Rodriguez, Wendy Aceituno and WARR77 Group LLC |
| 4:2026cv00624 |
| June 10, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Jeremy D Kernodle |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons issued as to Wendy Aceituno, Ruben Rodriguez, WARR77 Group LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons - Aceituno, #2 Summons - Rodriguez)(CLC) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue Summons in a Civil Action filed by MCM Solutions LLC. (Pringle, Lara) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to issue Summons in a Civil Action filed by MCM Solutions LLC. (Pringle, Lara) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue Summons in a Civil Action filed by MCM Solutions LLC. (Pringle, Lara) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wendy Aceituno, Ruben Rodriguez, WARR77 Group LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11595098.), filed by MCM SOLUTIONS LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pringle, Lara) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle. (CLC) |
| Case: MCM Solutions LLC v. Rodriguez et al was filed on 6/10/2026 and assigned to Judge Kernodle. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is provided via hyperlink. (CLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
