Cox v. General Counsel Secretary of Health & Human Services et al
| Darwin M. Cox |
| General Counsel Secretary of Health & Human Services, U.S. State Attorney Texas Eastern District and U.S. Attorney General |
| 4:2026cv00632 |
| June 12, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| J Campbell Barker |
| John D Love |
| Contract: Recovery Medicare |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Case: Cox v. General Counsel Secretary of Health & Human Services et al was filed on 6/12/2026 and assigned to Judge Barker and referred to Judge Love. (Clerk Reminder - Ensure this entry and the attached Non-prisoner Pro Se Instructions, Invitation to a Non-Prisoner Pro Se to E-Filing/Consent to Electronic Notice, and Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge are sent to Pro Se.) (CLC) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Darwin M. Cox. (CLC) |
| Filing 2 Non-prisoner pro se consent to receive electronic notice filed by Darwin M. Cox. (CLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against General Counsel Secretary of Health & Human Services, U.S. Attorney General, U.S. State Attorney Texas Eastern District (fee not paid), filed by Darwin M. Cox. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(CLC) |
| Case assigned to District Judge J. Campbell Barker and Magistrate Judge John D. Love. (CLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
