During et al v. UMT Global Logistics, LLC et al
| Alton Julian During and Charles Clark |
| UMT Global Logistics, LLC and John Doe Driver |
| 4:2026cv00677 |
| June 18, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by UMT Global Logistics, LLC from 380th District Court of Collin County, case number 380-01359-2026. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11612514), filed by UMT Global Logistics, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Index of State Court Filings, #2 Exhibit B State Court Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit C Plaintiff's Original Petition, #4 Exhibit D Citation UMT Global Logistics, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Supp/Removal case)(Hill, Jeffrey) |
| Case assigned to Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant. (jmb) |
| Case: 4:26-cv-00677-ALM During, et al., v. UMT Global Logistics, LLC, et al., was filed on 6/18/2026 and assigned to Judge Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is provided via hyperlink. (jmb) |
| Note: Pursuant to Local Rule CV 7(j), any motions pending in another federal or state court made by any party will be considered moot at the time of transfer or removal unless they are re-urged in this court. (jmb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
