Williams v. Kim et al
| Al Williams |
| Paul Kim, Shelby Simplier and MidFirst Bank |
| 4:2026cv00802 |
| July 8, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Aileen Goldman Durrett |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue Summonses and Subpoena filed by Al Williams. (CLC) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Al Williams. (CLC) |
| Filing 2 Case: Williams v. Kim et al was filed on 7/7/2026 and assigned to Judge Mazzant and referred to Judge Durrett. (Clerk Reminder - Ensure this entry and the attached Non-prisoner Pro Se Instructions, Invitation to a Non-Prisoner Pro Se to E-Filing/Consent to Electronic Notice, and Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge are sent to Pro Se.) (CLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Paul Kim, MidFirst Bank, Shelby Simplier (fee not paid), filed by Al Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(CLC) |
| Clerk's Notice of Mailing - Doc(s) #2 mailed to Al Williams at the address indicated on the NEF unless otherwise indicated. Mail type: Regular. (CLC) |
| Case assigned to Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant and Magistrate Judge Aileen Goldman Durrett. (CLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
