Newman v. Credit One Bank, N.A., et al.
| Jonathan Newman |
| Credit One Bank, N.A. and Equifax Information Services, LLC |
| 4:2026cv00835 |
| July 14, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Aileen Goldman Durrett |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons issued as to Credit One Bank, N.A., Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s) Summons Issued - Equifax)(jmb) |
| Filing 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Jonathan Newman (Panvini, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Credit One Bank, N.A., Equifax Information Services, LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11663097.), filed by Jonathan Newman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Panvini, Joseph) |
| Case assigned to Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant and referred to Magistrate Judge Aileen Goldman Durrett. (jmb) |
| Case: 4:26-cv-00835-ALM-AGD Newman v. Credit One Bank, N.A., et al. was filed on 7/14/2026 and assigned to Chief District Judge Mazzant and referred to Judge Durrett. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is provided via hyperlink. (jmb) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Jonathan Newman. (jmb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.