Cade et al v. Martinez-Vasquez et al
| Jim Cade and Ubaldo Cade |
| Leticia Maria Martinez-Vasquez and Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. |
| 4:2026cv00964 |
| July 30, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| J Campbell Barker |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER Regulating Practice. Signed by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 7/30/2026. (CLC)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Designation of Attorney in Charge to Robin Renee Gant on behalf of Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (Gant, Robin) |
| Filing 2 Additional Attachments to Main Document: #1 Notice of Removal,. Defendant Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.'s Disclosure Statement. (Gant, Robin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. from 431st Civil Court, Denton County, Texas, case number 26-6684-431. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11700818), filed by Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Gant, Robin) |
| Case assigned to District Judge J. Campbell Barker. (CLC) |
| Case: Cade et al v. Martinez-Vasquez et al was filed on 7/30/2026 and assigned to Judge Barker. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is provided via hyperlink. (CLC) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Jim Cade, Ubaldo Cade, Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (CLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
