Doe v. Chronister et al
| Jane Doe |
| Bettye Chronister, Roberto Barbosa, Micah Sailor and Shannon Doe |
| 4:2026cv01210 |
| September 4, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Aileen Goldman Durrett |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Under a Pseudonym by Jane Doe. (CLC) |
| Filing 3 Non-prisoner pro se consent to receive electronic notice filed by Jane Doe. (CLC) |
| Filing 2 Case: Doe v. Chronister et al was filed on 9/4/2026 and assigned to Judge Jordan and referred to Judge Durrett. (Clerk Reminder - Ensure this entry and the attached # Pro Se Instructions , # Invitation to a Non-Prisoner Pro Se to E-Filing/Consent to Electronic Notice , and # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge are sent to Pro Se.) (CLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Roberto Barbosa, Bettye Chronister, Shannon Doe, Micah Sailor (fee not paid), filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(CLC) |
| Case assigned to Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant and Magistrate Judge Aileen Goldman Durrett. (CLC) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Jane Doe. (CLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
