Rollins v. Murphy et al
| Kiandre Rollins |
| Roger Murphy and Living The Dream Express, LLC |
| 4:2026cv01321 |
| September 22, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Aileen Goldman Durrett |
| Amos L Mazzant |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Roger Murphy and Living The Dream Express, LLC from Cooke County, case number CV26-00302. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-11815230), filed by Roger Murphy and Living The Dream Express, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Smith, Madeline) |
| Case assigned to Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant and referred to Magistrate Judge Aileen Goldman Durrett. (rpc) |
| Case: Rollins v. Roger Murphy and Living The Dream Express, LLC was filed on 9/22/2026 and assigned to Judge Mazzant and referred to Judge Durrett. The # Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge form is attached. (rpc) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Kiandre Rollins, Roger Murphy and Living The Dream Express, LLC. (rpc) |
| Note: Pursuant to Local Rule CV 7(j), any motions pending in another federal or state court made by any party will be considered moot at the time of transfer or removal unless they are re-urged in this court. (rpc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
