Hughes v. City of Plano, Texas et al
| Kristopher DeShea Hughes |
| City of Plano, Texas, Plano Police Department, Collin County, Texas and Collin County Sheriff's Office |
| 4:2026cv01410 |
| September 30, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Aileen Goldman Durrett |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Non-prisoner pro se consent to receive electronic notice filed by Kristopher Hughes. (CLC) |
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER Assigning Prisoner Civil Rights Cases Filed in the Sherman Division to a Magistrate Judge. Signed by Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant and District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 9/30/2026. (CLC) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kristopher Hughes. (CLC) |
| Filing 2 Case: Hughes v. City of Plano, Texas et al was filed on 9/30/2026 and assigned to Judge Durrett. (Clerk Reminder - Ensure this entry and the attached Pro Se Instructions and Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge are sent to Pro Se.) (CLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Plano, Texas, Collin County Sheriff's Office, Collin County, Texas, Plano Police Department (fee not paid), filed by Kristopher Hughes.(CLC) |
| Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Aileen Goldman Durrett. (CLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
