Ashdown v. Denton Police Dept. (Warrants Dept.), et al.
| Phillip B Ashdown |
| Denton Police Dept. (Warrants Dept.), Chandler Holmes, Mr. Padgett, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 |
| 4:2026cv01452 |
| October 5, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Aileen Goldman Durrett |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerk's Notice of Mailing - Doc(s) #3 , #4 and the NEF for #4 mailed to the recipients listed in the NEF as well as Phillip Ashdown. Mail type: Regular. (jmb) |
| Filing 4 Case: 4:26-cv-01452-AGD Ashdown v. Denton Police Dept. (Warrants Dept.), et al., was filed on 10/5/2026 and assigned to Judge Magistrate Judge Aileen Goldman Durrett. (Clerk Reminder - Ensure this entry and the attached Pro Se Instructions and Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge are sent to Pro Se.) (jmb) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER Assigning Prisoner Civil Rights Cases Filed in the Sherman Division to a Magistrate Judge. Signed by Chief District Judge Amos L Mazzant on 3/1/2025. (jmb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Phillip B Ashdown. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (fee not paid), filed by Phillip B Ashdown. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmb) |
| Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Aileen Goldman Durrett. (jmb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.