Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc. v. Sharp Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc.
Defendant: Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronic Corporation, Dai Nippon Printing and DNP Color Techno Kameyama Co., Ltd.
Case Number: 5:2009cv00135
Filed: August 10, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Texarkana Office
Presiding Judge: Barry Bryant
Presiding Judge: David Folsom
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 260 ORDER re: 200 Report and Recommendations, sustaining in part and overruling in part 223 Defendants' Objections; denying 75 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Dai Nippon Printing.. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 8/10/09. (mrm, )
October 21, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 57 Motion to Compel; depostions of individuals from Japan to be taken before November 12, 2008; pltf to reimburse Sharp for half of costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barry Bryant on October 21, 2008. (rml, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc. v. Sharp Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel Fred Allison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sharp Corporation
Represented By: Robert W Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sharp Electronic Corporation
Represented By: Robert W Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dai Nippon Printing
Represented By: Nathaniel T Browand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DNP Color Techno Kameyama Co., Ltd.
Represented By: Nathaniel T Browand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?