Sweet v. Pilgrims Pride Corporation

Defendant: Pilgrims Pride Corporation
Plaintiff: Danny Charles Sweet, Sr
Case Number: 5:2013cv00024
Filed: March 18, 2013
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Office: Texarkana Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: Caroline Craven
Presiding Judge: Michael H. Schneider
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 28:451 Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 9, 2013 10 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting 9 Report and Recommendations; ORDERED that Plaintiffs above-referenced cause of action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 5/8/13. (mrm, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sweet v. Pilgrims Pride Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pilgrims Pride Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danny Charles Sweet, Sr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.