Scott E. Shine v. Ricky Jones Franklin County Sheriff
Scott Everett Shine |
Ricky Jones Franklin County Sheriff and John Does |
5:2017cv00051 |
March 3, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Texarkana Office |
Franklin |
Caroline Craven |
Robert W. Schroeder |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND CLOSING CASE. (IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Hickss claims against Defendant Heath Hyde are dismissed WITH prejudice. Plaintiff Shines § 1983 claims against Defendant Heath Hyde are dismissed WITH prej udice, and Plaintiff Shines state law breach of contract claim against Defendant Heath Hyde are dismissed WITHOUT prejudice. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE the case.) Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 5/1/2018. (slo, ) |
Filing 56 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 48 Report and Recommendation; It is ORDERED that 27 Motion to Dismiss filed by Ricky Jones is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs state-law claims alleging tortious interference with a contractual relationship against Defendant Jones are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and Plaintiffs § 1983 claims against Defendant Jones are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Ricky Jones (Franklin County Sheriff) terminated. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 1/22/2018. (slo, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.