Barksdale v. Director, TDCJ

Petitioner: Matthew Allen Barksdale
Respondent: Director, TDCJ
Case Number: 5:2018cv00006
Filed: January 10, 2018
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Office: Texarkana Office
County: Erath
Referring Judge: Caroline Craven
Presiding Judge: Robert W. Schroeder
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 11, 2018 3 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING VENUE Ordering that case is TRANSFERRED to Fort Worth Division in Northern District of Texas. (Held for 21 days pursuant to Local Rules to see if any objections). Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven on 1/11/2018. (sm, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barksdale v. Director, TDCJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Matthew Allen Barksdale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director, TDCJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?