Howard v. Prince
Plaintiff: Norris Howard
Defendant: James Prince
Case Number: 5:2018cv00029
Filed: February 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Office: Texarkana Office
County: Bowie
Presiding Judge: Caroline Craven
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 53 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT for 51 Report and Recommendation. It is ORDERED the Defendants motion for summary judgment (docket no. 44) is GRANTED and the above-styled civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED any and all motions which may be pending in this civil action are DENIED. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 3/14/2019. (slo, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Howard v. Prince
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Norris Howard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Prince
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?