Thomas v. Esper
| Joe E Thomas |
| Dr. Mark T Esper |
| 5:2018cv00110 |
| September 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Caroline Craven |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed Dr. Mark T Esper (Secretary of Army) served on 9/17/2018 (slo, ) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed Dr. Mark T Esper (US Attorney General) served on 9/18/2018, via certified mail, answer due 11/19/2018. (lfs, ) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed Dr. Mark T Esper (U. S. Attorney, Eastern District of Texas) served on 9/14/2018 via certified mail, answer due 11/13/2018. (lfs, ) |
| Answer Due Deadline Updated for Dr. Mark T Esper to 11/14/2018 per summons return of US Attorney Tyler (#8) (lfs, ) |
| CORRECTED Answer Due Deadline Updated for Dr. Mark T Esper to 11/13/2018 per document #8 Summons Return re: US Atty Eastern District of Texas. (lfs, ) |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Joe E Thomas as to #4 and #5 Orders on 9/13/2018. (sm, ) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Dr. Mark T Esper, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General and given to the United States Marshall for service, per Order. (Attachments: #1 Summons.USAttyGeneral, #2 Summons.USAtty.EasternDistrict)(sm, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and FURTHER Ordering that Clerk of Court issue and United States Marshall serve process without cost to plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven on 9/11/2018. (sm, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF READINESS Ordering that Plaintiff is to file a notice that case is ready for a scheduling conference when all Defendants have either answered or filed a motion to transfer or dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven on 9/11/2018. (sm, )
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Joe E Thomas. (lfs, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joe E Thomas. (lfs, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dr. Mark Esper, filed by Joe E Thomas. (Attachments: #1 EEOC letter) #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (lfs, ). Modified on 9/10/2018 (lfs, ). |
| Pro se guidelines, that include reporting changes of address to the Court, were given to the Plaintiff per U. S. Magistrate Judge Craven. (lfs, ) |
|
STANDING ORDER REFERRING PRO SE CASES to Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven for all pretrial matters. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 09/07/18. (lfs, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thomas v. Esper | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joe E Thomas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dr. Mark T Esper | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
