Nunnally, Sr. v. Warden, FPC Maxwell
Warden, FPC Maxwell |
Trevin Nunnally, Sr. |
5:2018cv00124 |
September 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Caroline Craven |
Robert W Schroeder |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 6-44377. (mjc, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER denying #6 Motion for Jury Trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven on 11/2/2018. (slo, ) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Jury Trial by Trevin Nunnally, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter, #2 Envelope(s))(slo, ) |
Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by Trevin Nunnally, Sr. on 10/9/2018 as to #3 ORDER REGARDING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS. (slo, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Produce and Inspect Electronically Stored Information from Cell Phone Recovered on 11/23/2017 by Trevin Nunnally, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter, #2 Envelope(s))(slo, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER REGARDING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS. It is ORDERED that petitioner shall, within twenty (20) days from the date set forth below,submit the filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by a statement prepared by an authorized BOP official showing the average balance and average deposits to petitioners inmate trust account for the preceding six months. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven on 10/02/18. (lfs, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Discovery by Trevin Nunnally, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter, #2 Envelope(s))(slo, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Memorandum in Support filed by Trevin Nunnally, Sr. (No filing fee or Motion for IFP received) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-2, #2 Cover letter, #3 Envelope(s))(slo, ) |
STANDING ORDER REFERRING HABEAS CASES to Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven for all pretrial matters. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 9/26/2018. (slo, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (slo, ) |
Forwarded the following to Petitioner: Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge; Docket sheet; and Pro Se Guidelines which includes information to report any change of address. (slo, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Nunnally, Sr. v. Warden, FPC Maxwell | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Warden, FPC Maxwell | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Trevin Nunnally, Sr. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.