Beasley, Sr. v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Kenneth Beasley, Sr.
Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill
Case Number: 5:2018cv00141
Filed: November 15, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Caroline Craven
Referring Judge: Robert W Schroeder
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 206
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2019 NOTICE: Per General Order 19-01, all civil actions pending in the Eastern District of Texas wherein the United States or an agency, corporation, officer or employee of the United States is a party are STAYED. All such cases shall remain stayed until such time as an appropriations bill or a continuing resolution is enacted restoring funding to the Department of Justice or a subsequent Order lifting this stay (in whole or in part) is entered. (slo, )
December 31, 2018 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kenneth Beasley, Sr.. Nancy A Berryhill served on 11/23/2018, answer due 1/22/2019. (Giles, Gregory)
November 20, 2018 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Nancy A Berryhill, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons-Atty General, #2 Summons-US Atty)(slo, )
November 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall issue and Plaintiff's attorney shall serve process without prepayment of costs or fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven on 11/16/18. (lfs, )
November 15, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kenneth Beasley, Sr.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Giles, Gregory)
November 15, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nancy A Berryhill, filed by Kenneth Beasley, Sr.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Giles, Gregory)
November 15, 2018 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (slo, )
November 15, 2018 Case Assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III. (slo, )
November 15, 2018 Opinion or Order STANDING ORDER REFERRING SOCIAL SECURITY CASES to Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven for all pretrial matters. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 11/15/2018. (slo, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beasley, Sr. v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Beasley, Sr.
Represented By: Gregory Ross Giles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?