Buerger v. Watson, Sr. et al
| Michelle M Buerger |
| Tammy N. Watson-Waldron, James E Watson, Sr. and J. Waldron |
| 5:2018cv00161 |
| December 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Caroline Craven |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to #6 Defendants James E. Watson, Sr., Tammy N. Watson-Waldron, and J. Waldrons Motion to Dismiss on or before March 15, 2019. (Order forwarded to Plaintiff via certified mail return receipt requested # 7002 2410 00003 5613 6747) Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven on 2/20/2019. (slo, )
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Readiness for Scheduling Conference by Michelle M Buerger (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(slo, ) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER. Plaintiff to file a notice that the case is ready for a schedulingconference when all Defendants have either answered or filed a motion to transfer or dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven on 2/4/2019. (slo, )
|
| Filing 6 First MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for a Civil Case by James E Watson, Sr.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wood, Marshall) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed. J. Waldron served by USM via certified mail on 1/11/2019, answer due 2/1/2019; James E Watson, Sr. served by USM via certified mail on 1/11/2019, answer due 2/1/2019; Tammy N. Watson-Waldron served by USM via certified mail on 1/11/2019, answer due 2/1/2019. (Attachments: #1 Summons Return Tammy Watson-Waldron, #2 Summons Return J Waldron)(slo, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to J. Waldron, James E Watson, Sr., Tammy N. Watson-Waldron. (Attachments: #1 Summons-J Waldron, #2 Summons-Tammy Watson-Waldron) (Summons issued and forwarded to USM for service on 1/3/2019. (slo) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and ordering that the Clerk of the Court shall issue and the United States Marshal shall serve process without prepayment of costs or fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven on 1/3/2019. (slo, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michelle M Buerger. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(slo, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against J. Waldron, James E Watson, Sr., Tammy N. Watson-Waldron filed by Michelle M Buerger. (Attachments: #1 Envelope(s))(slo, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Michelle M Buerger. (slo, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (slo, ) |
| Pro Se Guidelines (with instructions to notify Court of address changes), Docket Sheet and Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge forwarded to Plaintiff (slo, ) |
|
STANDING ORDER REFERRING PRO SE CASES to Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven for all pretrial matters. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 12/28/2018. (slo, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
