RANEY v. FRANKS
| BROOKE RANEY |
| HAYDEN FRANKS |
| 5:2019cv00094 |
| July 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT GRANTING #3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by BROOKE RANEY. It is therefore ORDERED that the above entitled and numbered cause is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All motions by either party not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED AS MOOT. It is further ORDERED that the Parties each bear their respective costs and expenses incurred in connection with this matter. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 07/24/19. (lfs, )
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss by BROOKE RANEY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order of Dismissal)(Crisp, John) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER. Plaintiffs request for an ex parte temporary restraining order is DENIED. This Order is without prejudice to Plaintiffs request for a temporary restraining order. The Court hereby SETS Plaintiffs Request for Temporary Restraining Order (Docket No. 1) for a hearing on Wednesday, July 31, 2019 at 2 p.m. in Texarkana, Texas. Plaintiff is ORDERED to immediately provide Defendant with notice of this hearing and serve a copy of the Complaint (Docket No. 1). Plaintiff shall file a notice with the Court when she has successfully complied with this instruction. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 07/19/19. (lfs, )
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER against HAYDEN FRANKS ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7347556.), filed by BROOKE RANEY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit "A" - Brooke Raney Letter of Resignation, #3 Exhibit "B" - Employment Agreement, #4 Exhibit "C" - Dr. Franks Termination Letter, #5 Exhibit "D" - Affidavit of Plaintiff Brooke Raney)(Crisp, John) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III. (lfs, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (lfs, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: RANEY v. FRANKS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: HAYDEN FRANKS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BROOKE RANEY | |
| Represented By: | John David Crisp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
