Cabell v. Dynamic Recovery Solutions LLC
| Joshua Cabell |
| Dynamic Recovery Solutions LLC |
| 5:2020cv00047 |
| April 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Additional Attachments to Main Document: #8 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Malone, Robbie) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof by Dynamic Recovery Solutions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Malone, Robbie) |
Filing 7
ORDER (Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 6/17/2020 10:45 AM before District Judge Robert W. Schroeder III.) Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 5/22/2020. (slo, )
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying as moot #4 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 05/14/20. (lfs, )
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Dynamic Recovery Solutions LLC, filed by Joshua Cabell.(Findsen, Lisbeth) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Dynamic Recovery Solutions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Malone, Robbie) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joshua Cabell. Dynamic Recovery Solutions LLC served on 4/8/2020, answer due 4/29/2020. (Findsen, Lisbeth) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Dynamic Recovery Solutions LLC. (slo, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III. (slo, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Joshua Cabell. (slo, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (slo, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dynamic Recovery Solutions LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7734647.), filed by Joshua Cabell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Findsen, Lisbeth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cabell v. Dynamic Recovery Solutions LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joshua Cabell | |
| Represented By: | Lisbeth Findsen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dynamic Recovery Solutions LLC | |
| Represented By: | Robbie LuAnn Malone |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
