Sable Networks, Inc. et al v. Fortinet, Inc.
Plaintiff: Sable Networks, Inc. and Sable IP, LLC
Defendant: Fortinet, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2020cv00109
Filed: June 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Robert W Schroeder
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2020 Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued as to Fortinet, Inc. (slo, )
June 16, 2020 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (slo, )
June 16, 2020 Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III. (slo, )
June 16, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Elizabeth L DeRieux on behalf of Sable IP, LLC, Sable Networks, Inc. (DeRieux, Elizabeth)
June 16, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Dorian S. Berger on behalf of Sable IP, LLC, Sable Networks, Inc. (Berger, Dorian)
June 16, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Designation of Attorney in Charge to Daniel P. Hipskind on behalf of Sable IP, LLC, Sable Networks, Inc. (Hipskind, Daniel)
June 16, 2020 Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Hipskind, Daniel)
June 16, 2020 Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Sable IP, LLC, Sable Networks, Inc.. (Hipskind, Daniel)
June 16, 2020 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Sable IP, LLC, Sable Networks, Inc. (Hipskind, Daniel)
June 16, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Fortinet, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7842781.), filed by Sable Networks, Inc., Sable IP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hipskind, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sable Networks, Inc. et al v. Fortinet, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fortinet, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sable Networks, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel P. Hipskind
Represented By: Dorian S. Berger
Represented By: Elizabeth L DeRieux
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sable IP, LLC
Represented By: Daniel P. Hipskind
Represented By: Dorian S. Berger
Represented By: Elizabeth L DeRieux
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?