Pond v Braum's
| Barbara Pond |
| Braum's, Inc. |
| 5:2021cv00008 |
| January 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Caroline Craven |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER setting Scheduling Conference for 4/28/2021 10:00 AM (Texarkana) before Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven. Counsel and all unrepresentedparties must appear via telephone. TELECONFERENCE NUMBER: 877-336-1839ACCESS CODE: 4068507, FOLLOWED BY #. The purpose of the scheduling conference will be to confirm the trial setting and to resolve any case management disputes or concerns. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven on 3/12/21. (lfs, )
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Readiness for Scheduling Conference by Barbara Pond (Roach, Nelson) |
| Filing 5 Defendant Braum's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Braum's, Inc..(Allred, William) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file a notice that the case is ready for a scheduling conference when all Defendants have either answered or filed a motion to transfer or dismiss. The notice must be filed within five days of the last remaining Defendants answer or motion. The notice must include a list of any pending motions to dismiss or transfer and a list of anyrelated cases previously filed in the Eastern District of Texas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven on 01/22/21. (lfs, )
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Braum's, Inc.. (lfs, ) |
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for all pretrial matters. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 01/21/21. (lfs, )
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Braum's, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lfs, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (lfs, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III. (lfs, ) |
| Filing fee paid: $402.00, receipt number #0540-8208361 via Pay.Gov/ECF (smh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pond v Braum's | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Braum's, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | William F Allred |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Barbara Pond | |
| Represented By: | Nelson J Roach |
| Represented By: | Nelson James Roach |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
