Lewis v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
| Shannon Lewis |
| John Does (1-5) and U.S. Xpress, Inc. |
| 5:2021cv00048 |
| April 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE by U.S. Xpress, Inc. regarding Mediation (Scudder, Mark) |
Filing 8
DISCOVERY ORDER. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 6/7/2021. (slo, )
|
|
Filing 7
DOCKET CONTROL ORDER (Amended Pleadings due by 12/28/2021. Motions in Limine due by 2/22/2022. Joint Pretrial Order due by 2/22/2022. Jury Selection set for 3/28/2022 09:00 AM in Ctrm 319 (Texarkana) before District Judge Robert W. Schroeder III. Jury Trial set for 3/28/2022 09:00 AM in Ctrm 319 (Texarkana) before District Judge Robert W. Schroeder III. Pretrial Conference set for 3/8/2022 10:00 AM in Ctrm 319 (Texarkana) before District Judge Robert W. Schroeder III.) Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 6/7/2021. (slo, )
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER Cancelling Scheduling Conference. The Court finds that a scheduling conference is unnecessary in this case. The scheduling conference is therefore CANCELLED.Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 6/7/21. (slo)
|
| Filing 5 Submission of d and s by U.S. Xpress, Inc. (Joint Motion for Entry of Docket Control Order and Discovery Order). (Attachments: #1 Joint Proposed Docket Control Order, #2 Joint Proposed Discovery Order)(Scudder, Mark) |
|
Filing 4
Scheduling Conference set for 6/9/2021 01:00 PM in Ctrm 319 (Texarkana) before District Judge Robert W. Schroeder III. The purpose of the scheduling conference will be to confirm the trial setting and to resolve any case management disputes or concerns. The parties shall prepare and submit a joint motion attaching a joint proposed docket control order and a joint proposed discovery order within the time periods contained in the schedule set forth below.1 These orders shall be guided by the sample orders for non-patent cases that can be found on the Courts website. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 4/29/21. (lfs, ) (lfs, ).
|
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by U.S. Xpress, Inc. (Scudder, Mark) |
| Filing 2 PETITION FILED IN STATE COURT.(lfs, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by U.S. Xpress, Inc. from 102nd District Court, case number 21C0075-102. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8376288), filed by U.S. Xpress, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Local Rule Information Sheet, #2 Exhibit B - Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit C - Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit C1 - Plaintiff's Original Petition, #5 Exhibit C2 - Citation to US Xpress, #6 Exhibit C3 - Executed Citation for US Xpress, #7 Exhibit C4 - Defendant US Xpress Original Answer)(Scudder, Mark) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III. (lfs, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (lfs, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
