Boykin, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Darren Boykin v. Weaver et al
| Keisha Boykin, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Darren Boykin and Paris Thorpe |
| Jerrika Weaver, Brent Hobbs and William Scott |
| Darren Boykin |
| 5:2021cv00106 |
| August 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Caroline Craven |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jeff Taylor Jackson on behalf of Brent Hobbs, William Scott (Jackson, Jeff) |
| Filing 19 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Intervenor's Complaint re Jerrika Weaver.( Weber, Robert) |
| Filing 18 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Brent Hobbs, William Scott (as to Intervenor's Complaint).(Coleman, Darren) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Intervenor's Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Jerrika Weaver to 11/5/2021. 23 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( bas) |
| Defendants' Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Intervenor's Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Brent Hobbs and William Scott to 11/5/2021. 23 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( bas) |
| Filing 21 Intervenor Plaintiff's Amended Original Complaint filed by Darren Boykin.(hma) |
| Filing 17 ANSWER to #7 Amended Complaint by Brent Hobbs, William Scott.(Coleman, Darren) |
| Filing 16 ANSWER to #7 Amended Complaint by Jerrika Weaver.(Weber, Robert) |
Filing 15
ORDER granting #10 Amended MOTION to Intervene filed by Darren Boykin. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven on 10/12/2021. (slo, )
|
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Jerrika Weaver to 10/14/2021. ( slo, ) |
| Filing 14 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Jerrika Weaver.( Weber, Robert) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert William Weber on behalf of Jerrika Weaver (Weber, Robert) |
| Filing 12 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Brent Hobbs, William Scott.( Coleman, Darren) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Brent Hobbs to 10/14/2021; William Scott to 10/14/2021. ( slo, ) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Keisha Boykin, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Darren Boykin, Paris Thorpe. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es), #2 Summons(es))(Roberts, James) |
| Filing 10 Amended MOTION to Intervene by Darren Boykin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Intervenor Plaintiff Darren Boykin's Amended Original Complaint, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Washington, Daryl) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Michael S. Kahan on behalf of Darren Boykin. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-8573368. (Kahan, Michael) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION to Intervene by Darren Boykin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Intervenor Plaintiff's Original Complaint)(Washington, Daryl) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/8/2021: #2 Text of Proposed Order) (slo, ). |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Brent Hobbs, William Scott, Jerrika Weaver, filed by Keisha Boykin, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Darren Boykin.(Roberts, James) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF READINESS. Within five days of the last remaining Defendant's answer or motion, Plaintiff shall file a notice that the case is ready for a scheduling conference when all Defendants have either answered or filed a motion to transfer or dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven on 8/31/21. (hma)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Brent Hobbs, William Scott, Jerrika Weaver. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es) Scott, #2 Summons(es) Hobbs)(slo, ) |
|
Filing 4
Standing Order Referring 40% of Civil Cases to Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven for all pretrial matters. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 8/30/2021. (slo, )
|
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III. (slo, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury. (slo, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (slo, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Scott H Palmer on behalf of Keisha Boykin, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Darren Boykin (Palmer, Scott) |
| Filing 2 Additional Attachments to Main Document: #1 Complaint (Certificate of Interested Persons) (Roberts, James) Modified on 8/30/2021 (slo) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brent Hobbs, William Scott, Jerrika Weaver ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8559273.), filed by Keisha Boykin, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Darren Boykin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Roberts, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
