DEXON COMPUTER, INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., et al
| DEXON COMPUTER, INC. |
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., and CDW CORPORATION |
| 5:2022cv00053 |
| April 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Caroline Craven |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 MOTION to Dismiss by CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Dacus, Deron) |
| Filing 21 MOTION to Change Venue to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California by CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Text of Proposed Order)(Dacus, Deron) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Richard J. Nelson on behalf of CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-8987603. (Nelson, Richard) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Louis Feuchtbaum on behalf of CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-8987578. (Feuchtbaum, Louis) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Chiseul Kim on behalf of CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-8982777. (Kim, Chiseul) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Ryan M. Folio on behalf of CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-8982766. (Folio, Ryan) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Alex Atticus Parkinson on behalf of CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-8982746. (Parkinson, Alex) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Aaron M Panner on behalf of CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-8982720. (Panner, Aaron) |
| Filing 14 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re CDW CORPORATION.( Doan, Jennifer) |
| Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is GRANTED pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for CDW CORPORATION to 7/8/2022. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( slo, ) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Thomas York on behalf of CDW CORPORATION. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-8942563. (York, Thomas) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by James Arthur Reeder, Jr on behalf of CDW CORPORATION (Reeder, James) |
| Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by CDW CORPORATION identifying Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group for CDW CORPORATION. (Doan, Jennifer) |
| Filing 10 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re CDW CORPORATION.( Doan, Jennifer) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Cole Alan Riddell on behalf of CDW CORPORATION (Riddell, Cole) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jennifer Haltom Doan on behalf of CDW CORPORATION (Doan, Jennifer) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is GRANTED pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for CDW CORPORATION to 6/23/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( slo, ) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,.( Dacus, Deron) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is GRANTED pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. to 6/23/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( slo, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER that Plaintiff file a notice that the case is ready for a scheduling conference when all Defendants have either answered or filed a motion to transfer or dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven on 5/18/2022. (slo, )
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by DEXON COMPUTER, INC.. CDW CORPORATION served on 5/3/2022, answer due 5/24/2022. (Davis, William) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by DEXON COMPUTER, INC.. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., served on 5/3/2022, answer due 5/24/2022. (Davis, William) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by David Reichenberg on behalf of DEXON COMPUTER, INC.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-8897705. (Reichenberg, David) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. and CDW CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Summons-CDW Corporation)(slo, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III. (slo, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by DEXON COMPUTER, INC. (slo, ) |
|
STANDING ORDER REFERRING 40% of CASES to Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven for all pretrial matters. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 4/28/2022. (slo, )
|
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (slo, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CDW CORPORATION, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8893675.), filed by DEXON COMPUTER, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davis, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
