ANTWINE v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD et al
Plaintiff: CHARLES ANTWINE
Defendant: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD and GREIS TRUCKING AND EXCAVATION INC
Case Number: 5:2022cv00140
Filed: November 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Robert W Schroeder
Nature of Suit: Federal Employer's Liability
Cause of Action: 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff's unopposed motion for an extension of time to respond to Defendants' motion to dismiss. Docket No. #13 . Having considered the motion, and because it is unopposed, the Court finds that good cause exists to GRANT the motion. The Court therefore ORDERS that the requested discovery shall be completed on or before February 14, 2023, and Plaintiffs response shall be filed by February 28, 2023. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 12/7/2022. (psm)
December 6, 2022 Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by CHARLES ANTWINE. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Tidwell, Kelly)
December 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER This case is set for a scheduling conference in Texarkana, Texas on January 11, 2023 at 4 p.m. before the undersigned. The purpose of the scheduling conference will e to confirm the trial setting and to resolve any case management disputes or concerns. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 12/5/2022. (psm)
December 2, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Readiness for Scheduling Conference by CHARLES ANTWINE (Tidwell, Kelly)
December 1, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE by CHARLES ANTWINE Plaintiff's Rule 26a Initial Disclosures (Zito, Marc)
November 28, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by GREIS TRUCKING AND EXCAVATION INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit of Denise Solomon in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, #2 Text of Proposed Order Order on Defendant Greis Trucking and Excavation, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims Pursuant to Federal Rule 12(b)(2), #3 Text of Proposed Order Order on Defendant Greis Trucking and Excavation, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims Pursuant to Federal Rule 12(b)(3))(Shipman, Michael)
November 23, 2022 Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD.(Hutchinson, Terria)
November 15, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE (Certificate of Interested Parties) by CHARLES ANTWINE (Zito, Marc) Modified on 11/15/2022 (slo, ).
November 9, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CHARLES ANTWINE. GREIS TRUCKING AND EXCAVATION INC served on 11/7/2022, answer due 11/28/2022. (Zito, Marc)
November 7, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CHARLES ANTWINE. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD served on 11/7/2022, answer due 11/28/2022. (Zito, Marc)
November 4, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to GREIS TRUCKING AND EXCAVATION INC, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD and returned to Plaintiff for service. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es)(slo, )
November 3, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kelly B Tidwell on behalf of CHARLES ANTWINE (Tidwell, Kelly)
November 3, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Geoffrey Patton Culbertson on behalf of CHARLES ANTWINE (Culbertson, Geoffrey)
November 3, 2022 Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III. (slo, )
November 3, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (slo, )
November 3, 2022 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by CHARLES ANTWINE. (slo, )
November 2, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT CHARLES W ANTWINE against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9209554.), filed by CHARLES ANTWINE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons(es), #3 Summons(es))(Zito, Marc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ANTWINE v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHARLES ANTWINE
Represented By: Marc A Zito
Represented By: Geoffrey Patton Culbertson
Represented By: Kelly B Tidwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
Represented By: Terria M. Hutchinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GREIS TRUCKING AND EXCAVATION INC
Represented By: Michael Joe Shipman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?