Worley v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.
| Rodney Worley |
| Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. |
| 5:2023cv00103 |
| October 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| James Boone Baxter |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. (Flores, Mark) |
| Filing 6 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc..(Flores, Mark) |
| Filing 5 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.(Flores, Mark) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. to 11/30/2023. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(slo) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rodney Worley. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. served on 10/7/2023. (Hommel, William) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. (slo) |
Filing 2
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge James Boone Baxter for all pretrial matters. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 10/4/2023. (slo)
|
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (slo) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (slo, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury. (slo) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BTXEDC-9737938.), filed by Rodney Worley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hommel, William) (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/4/2023) (slo, ).COMPLAINT against Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BTXEDC-9737938.), filed by Rodney Worley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hommel, William) (Attachment 1 replaced with flattened image on 10/4/2023) (slo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Worley v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rodney Worley | |
| Represented By: | William S Hommel, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Mark Anthony Flores |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
