Shine v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
| Titanna Shine |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 5:2024cv00044 |
| March 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| James Boone Baxter |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #3 Complaint by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Originally filed in District Court of Titus County, Texas; Cause No. 43391)(SLO) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company filed by Titanna Shine. (Originally filed in District Court of Titus County, Texas; Cause No. 43391)(SLO) |
Filing 2
REFERRAL ORDER RG-72-3 REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge James Boone Baxter for all pretrial matters. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 3/28/2024. (SLO)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Notice of Removal from 76th District Court, case number 43391. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10056673), filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Additional Attachment(s) List of Attorneys, #3 Additional Attachment(s) List of Parties, #4 Additional Attachment(s) Certified Docket Sheet, #5 Affidavit/Declaration Declaration of Weslie Sawyer, #6 Additional Attachment(s) State Court Pleadings)(Boyd, Paul) |
| Notified Attorney, Per GO 04-12, this court no longer accepts pleadings in paper form. The Clerk will no longer mail or fax notices or orders to parties. All notices and orders generated by this court shall be sent electronically. ***ATTORNEY NOT ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN OUR COURT ATTORNEY ADMISSION LETTER SENT VIA EMAIL*** (SLO) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (SLO) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (SLO) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury. (SLO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shine v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Titanna Shine | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Paul M Boyd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
