Hogan v. Cole et al
Hal D. Hogan |
Kim Cole and Debra Cole |
5:2024cv00143 |
September 23, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
James Boone Baxter |
Robert W Schroeder |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Non-prisoner pro se consent to receive electronic notice filed by Hal D. Hogan. (slo) |
Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge James Boone Baxter. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 9/23/2024. (slo) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Debra Cole, Kim Cole filed by Hal D. Hogan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(slo) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (slo) |
Docket Sheet, Pro Se Guidelines, Consent to Proceed and Non-Prisoner Pro Se Consent to Recieve Electronica Notice provided to Plaintiff. (slo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.