Rosse v. Johnston et al
Plaintiff: Samuel Rosse
Defendant: J. Johnston, FNU Hataway and FNU Henry
Case Number: 5:2025cv00017
Filed: February 20, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: James Boone Baxter
Referring Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2025 INITIAL Partial Filing fee paid per court order: $ 50.00, receipt number 6-69076. (ndc)
April 4, 2025 Filing 4 Acknowledgment of Receipt by Samuel Rosse as to #3 Order for Initial Partial Filing Fee. (Acknowledgment unsigned but returned with $50.00 partial filing fee) (slo)
February 26, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Partial Filing Fee of $50.00 within 30 days for Samuel Rosse. (Motion(s) #2 terminated). Signed by Magistrate Judge James Boone Baxter on 2/26/2025. (slo)
February 20, 2025 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (with trust fund data sheet attached) by Samuel Rosse. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter, #2 Envelope)(slo)
February 20, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FNU Hataway, FNU Henry, J. Johnston filed by Samuel Rosse. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter, #2 Envelope)(slo)
February 20, 2025 Opinion or Order GENERAL ORDER referring prisoner civil right cases to Magistrate Judge James Boone for Baxter for all pretrial matters. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 2/20/2025. (slo)
February 20, 2025 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (slo)
February 20, 2025 Sent Consent to Magistrate, Docket sheet and Prose guidelines, that include information regarding reporting change of address to court, to the Petitioner per Magistrate Judge via regular mail (slo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rosse v. Johnston et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samuel Rosse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Johnston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FNU Hataway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FNU Henry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?