Pantech Corporation v. TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO., LTD. et al
| Pantech Corporation |
| TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO., LTD., TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd., TCL Communication Ltd., TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd., TCL MOBILE INTERNATIONAL LTD.;, Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co., Ltd. and TCL MOBILE COMMUNICATION (HK) COMPANY LTD. |
| 5:2025cv00091 |
| July 3, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| James Boone Baxter |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge James Boone Baxter on 9/2/2025. (psm)
|
| Filing 7 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Stay Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1659 Pending ITC Determination by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McPhail, Donald) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co., Ltd., TCL Communication Ltd., TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd., TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd., TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO., LTD., TCL MOBILE COMMUNICATION (HK) COMPANY LTD., TCL MOBILE INTERNATIONAL LTD. (Attachments: #1 Summons-TCL COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LTD., #2 Summons-TCL ELECTRONICS HOLDINGS LTD., #3 Summons-TCL MOBILE INTERNATIONAL LTD., #4 Summons- TCL COMMUNICATION LTD, #5 Summons-HUIZHOU TCL MOBILE COMMUNICATION CO., LTD., #6 Summons- TCL MOBILE COMMUNICATION (HK) COMPANY LTD.)(slo) Modified on 7/15/2025 (slo). |
Filing 5
ORDER. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file a notice that the case is ready for scheduling conference when Defendants have either answered or filed a motion to transfer or dismiss. The notice shall be filed within five days of Defendants' answer or motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge James Boone Baxter on 7/7/2025. (slo)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kelly B Tidwell on behalf of Pantech Corporation (Tidwell, Kelly) |
| Filing 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Pantech Corporation identifying Other Affiliate Ideahub, Inc. for Pantech Corporation. (Culbertson, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 emailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Culbertson, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Huizhou TCL Mobile Communication Co., Ltd., TCL Communication Ltd., TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd., TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd., TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO., LTD., TCL MOBILE COMMUNICATION (HK) COMPANY LTD., TCL MOBILE INTERNATIONAL LTD.; ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10940287.), filed by Pantech Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4)(Culbertson, Geoffrey) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III. (slo) |
| Case referred to Magistrate Judge James Boone Baxter for all pretrial matters. (slo) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (slo) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury. (slo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.